Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 03:41

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What happens to adults with Down syndrome when their parents can't look after them any more?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This email app is Gmail on steroids, and I can't recommend it enough - Android Police
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Netflix’s Buzzy New Doc About an Infamous Tragedy Shows It’s Just the Beginning - Slate Magazine
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are some of the most annoying movie clichés?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What is your review of Kota Factory Season 3 (TVF Original)?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
watchOS 26 preview: 5 new Apple Watch features I can’t wait to try - Tom's Guide